Cerulean

sometimes  I fall asleep

and dream that I'm

holding a picture of you

I am young and it is blurry and

you are gone

mom is saying I'm too young to

call it what it is, saying

there will be others,

all the fish in the

great cerulean sea I'll

see them all

one day, she says

but when I open my eyes I'm 

swimming in yours,

nothing is blurry and

all the fish understood

when I fell for the sea

Nirvana Vapor

The last book I read was Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut. That was two months ago. I remember how it affected me. I remember how all the books I've read affected me. Every single one.

It sucks that time has a way of fogging the what, though -- what it was that affected me specifically. Sometimes I can recall distinct phrases, the shapes of the words in the book that finally boiled it down for me, and I don't forget those. But so often, I forget the context, which, boiled down, is what made the phrase so poignant.

What do we lose in our constant forward motion? What do we lose when time continues to pass, leaving the Bokononists far behind us?

"See the cat?" he pleaded. "See the cradle?!"

The Trouble With Forgetting

Everybody's got some kind of problem. For some, addiction runs rampant -- compulsive, destructive behavior is harder for some to curb than others. Some people have trouble coping with things, with death and the finality of it; with life and its illusory infinity.

I have trouble forgetting.

It's not that it's harder for me to forget things than it is for others. It's not the opposite -- that I have trouble remembering things -- either. I simply have a rough time with the concept of...forgetting.

Occasionally I'll be talking to someone, usually a fellow writer, and we end up on the topic of writing. Why we do it. And always, without fail, I will point one sure finger at my fear of forgetting, and follow it up by explaining that I watched my grandmother die of Alzheimer's.

The thing is, I'm not entirely sure of that explanation myself.  Maybe it's just the easiest explanation...it's the one that makes the most sense; the one that tabulates when all my tendencies are plugged into the equation.

For one, I don't remember that experience affecting me so deeply at the time. I was 7 or 8 years old when we visited my grandmother at the nursing home, and while I was old enough to understand what the disease was doing to her, I hardly knew the woman outside of vague circus memories and the smell of the quilt she made me. Before she was living in a nursing home, we only saw her once or twice a year, even though she lived closer to us than other relatives. I didn't even cry at her funeral.

There are a few things I do remember, though; and I remember those things in high resolution.

I remember walking into her room at the nursing home; the smell of the place; the lack of children or family and the way they all turned their heads when we walked by. I remember taking my little sister outside because she was bored, and an old lady slowly chasing us around the circular courtyard because she thought we were her grandchildren and that we were running away from her. I remember a resident stealing a toy Ant had brought with her, and my mom having to ask a nurse to get it out of the lady's pocket.

I remember waking up on Sunday morning, whining because I didn't want to go to the nursing home, and my mother telling me, "I know you don't like it but we have to go because daddy needs us to be there." I remember one of the last times we visited her there, she was sitting in a rocking chair, staring straight ahead and saying, "I'm going to my mama's house in Lutcher."

I asked my dad what Lutcher was, and he told me that Lutcher was where his parents were born. I remember wondering -- I might have asked him -- why we'd never been there, and why I'd never even heard of the place. Of all the trips to Grand Isle, of all the stories my dad told me about ghost town interstate exits and bridges and bayous...of the hundreds of times I'd ridden shotgun as we passed the exit, he hadn't ever thought to mention the importance of Lutcher.

If I asked him, I don't remember the answer, because after that, the memory is shrouded in a thick sadness -- and I'm not sure if it's part of the original memory or if it developed through hindsight. More than sadness, it was loss, for something that was being taken from me before I possessed it; nostalgia for a past that wasn't mine, but was still somehow part of me. It was all inside of this woman, and she was rocking back and forth before me, losing her mind. By the time I'd thought to pick her brain, it had mostly disintegrated.

If it hadn't been too late, would her answers have been important to me? Would her experiences have connected dots I still don't know are there? Probably not. I probably wouldn't have put much value in her words at age 8, even there in that room on that particular Sunday. I have, however, thought of that Sunday often enough for it to have...done something, I guess, to the way I live my life. Maybe?

I have trouble with forgetting. I think of it as a loss, not of synapses or tissue or even dignity, but of progress; in much the same way as some people lose car keys or an old padlock combination. It sounds silly, but when I forget what happened in some coffee shop on some random day, I can't handle it, I can't start the car, I can't unlock the door to my house. From an absurdly young age, I started documenting my memories -- not just in journals, but also by thinking about them repeatedly -- going back over their contours; retracing the lines so they'd never be faint enough to disappear completely.

But who's to say that this habit has anything to do with my grandmother losing her mind to Alzheimer's when I was 8? When I can't remember something, I don't imagine her face, I don't hear her words. When I'm staring at a blank document trying to summon subconscious details of a specific time and place in my life, listening to a song that played in that time and place, I'm never trying to recall memories of her. Maybe it's because I don't have many of her to recall.

I've wondered if it wasn't her at all, but rather, the lack of her -- all the things she didn't live long enough for me to ask her; all the weight in that room that I couldn't have possibly understood so young. Maybe all the things she forgot at the end of her life became the empty core of the reason I'm driven to remember every single moment of mine.

Maybe I don't want my granddaughter to learn of her roots by accident; maybe I don't want to leave such things to the slim chance that my dying mind will recall them when she's in the room. Maybe it's that simple, and I've just convoluted it with my own cursed, sharp memory. Who knows.

What Happened In 2012

Fuck, that was one hell of a year. 

Right before the end of 2011, I had to face Josh for the first time since I'd become a workaholic journalist; the first time since his catalytic departure; the first time since he'd shattered me, the first time since that break forced me to redesign the window through which I watch my life. 

Then, in June, I slept in the ruins of a burned-out Civil War-era plantation, climbed to the highest point in Arkansas, watched a music documentary in a field with a hundred strangers in downtown Oklahoma City. I crossed the Continental Divide at least four times and entered a homemade castle deep in the mountains of Colorado. I climbed a benign-looking mountainside and discovered the bluest, high-altitude lake I have ever seen, while learning that parsley grows wild there. 

I pitched a tent in the darkest desert of Utah late at night, and woke up surrounded by a golden sandstone fortress. I bought some homemade pocketbooks from a hippie in Moab, bloodied my leg on a rusty chain link fence that stood between me and the most mind-blowing apricots I've ever eaten; I swam in a desert stream with descending pools of fresh water and buffed my bare feet on ancient stone walls carved by eras of desert wind. I stole a cactus clipping that pricked me no less than three times that month. I hiked in a permit-only section of Arches National Park called the Fiery Furnace, where inexperienced hikers often get lost and severely dehydrated, and made it out with nothing but a mean sunburn and a small case of the grumps. 

I rode shotgun for the entire length of the Loneliest Highway in the United States, which ended up causing a permanent association with that road and certain Beatles songs. I stole a neat spoon from a pho place in California, drank Carneros in Napa, and got the sweetest campground next to the sweetest spot to see the sun set over Lake Tahoe (it looks like sherbet). I saw the Pacific Ocean for the first time through a milky mist and had to stand on a rock for a second to wrap my head around the fact that I was standing on the west coast. I was terrified in a truck going too fast down Hwy 1 in a nasty rainstorm -- S-curves and only several feet of visibility -- camped in the truck and woke up to a bill for $30 on the windshield from the ranger. 

I made a very strange jambalaya over a gas stove on a windy night in the redwoods, drinking champagne to quell my fear of the creaking 100-foot tree above me. I wandered through the redwoods like an ant would wander through any forest back home, and I wondered if ants also get dizzy when they point their eyes to the sky in such a place. 

I went to the farm Josh has called home for the past few years, and slept in a garage I'd only seen in the background of our Skype sessions. I drank with the people he preferred over his own family, and I began to understand the choices he made. I got drunk and named our future children near some giant elephant ears on an Oregon riverbank, and sat on a cliff for an hour trying to summon the guts to jump into the river -- the guts never came, even as Josh jumped off for a third time. After the most miserably cold and misty mud-hike of the month, I got naked and took a dip in a natural public hot springs. Eventually, all the other folks left us and we found the pool that matched our body temperature almost exactly, and stayed there so long that leaving it felt like being born into a cold, dark world.

I went fishing with Dave and Paula in the mountain wilderness of Montana, made a campfire that would eventually witness my first grilled avocado, and woke up to a cold storm that we forgot about by getting incredibly stoned in our small tent and falling asleep, clinging to each other in the same sarcophagus sleeping bag. I laughed at how annoyed I was by the traffic in Yellowstone -- at how the 18 SUVs ahead of us would stop and hang cameras out the window every time a napping buffalo was spotted near the road. Tiny Asian children ran in circles around me as I filmed an erupting geyser with my iPhone, and was relieved when Josh said he wanted to get out of there too. 

The Grand Tetons were like the event horizon -- the biggest things I'd ever seen, that I would never, ever reach. I hiked food down a ravine on the side of the road in bear country, pitched a tent near a stream and freaked out every time I heard a twig snap. I kept Josh awake until we got to a hotel in a state I can't remember, and took the most...productive...shower I might ever take in my life. The southern humidity switched on right past the Missouri state line, and I decided that Missouri was Missourable. As I looked at the GPS when we finally entered Louisiana, I caught myself looking for all the state parks on the map that I'd never noticed before. When I unlocked my front door for the first time in a month, it almost didn't register as home. 

A month spent seeing incredible things forced me to redefine home, in ways I saw both immediately and gradually. Most immediately, I realized I had just spent a month in a dirty truck and a very small tent with one person, and that there was not a day -- nor hour, nor minute -- where I felt anything negative toward him or our conditions. It was so good, it probably looked fake from the outside. 

If anyone had told me that I should be waiting for the honeymoon to end at that point, I'd have assured them that I was wincing in anticipation. But no one did, and I eventually stopped wincing. What is a honeymoon, anyway? It's come to be seen as a couple's last hurrah; the sweetest vacation the two will enjoy without the future burden of children and mortgages and fights and aging; a period of time two people spend doing nothing else but reveling in their own love story. I might have been waiting for ours to end, but six months after our June getaway, I haven't stopped reveling in our love story. 

There are ups and downs -- we've gotten in one boss-level spat in the near year we've been together, and our emotional frequencies don't always sync up. We've hurt each other both accidentally and intentionally, but we have never left those rooms when one of us is still bleeding on the floor. We've never been so angry that we're not patient with each other when the fire dies down. And, in all its pride-eating glory, that gesture continues to show me something that nobody has ever been able to explain to me about love.

It's just like me to try to explain it, of course.

Through the events of a life, a person has opportunities to grab the stuff that makes them capable of loving someone else in a real way. Collecting the L, O, V, and E isn't the end of it though. Those letters might elate you, empower you, and make you believe in altruism, but they alone won't let you understand the word they spell. I thought I understood the word. I even swore I didn't need a serious partner to display my understanding -- it was all about the universe and how you treat people; you don't need to give it all to one person to make it pure -- which is correct, more or less, but it's looking at only two dimensions of a three-dimensional concept.

I didn't understand that third dimension until I had to face Josh a year ago. After his actions made me rip up the L, O, V, and E I'd collected throughout my life, after I'd convinced myself those letters were destructible as they regarded him, and after I had finally shut him out of my life, in much the same fashion as he had shut me out countless times in our long history, he showed up at my doorstep, wanting a beer and my company. The same night, as I laid on the couch across the room from him sleeping, I spent a good while trying to suffocate my happiness, simply because I knew he'd done nothing to deserve it. I tried to think about all the pain in an effort to become angry.

I would say it came on gradually because it seems like this sort of thing wouldn't happen all at once, but it was anything but gradual -- in a breath, I saw both the absurdity and the futility in what I was doing.

When I allowed myself to think it, "I love him" became the only thing I knew. It no longer mattered what he had done to me, nor the blatant inconsideration he employed to show up here, nor what he'd ever do to hurt me in the future. It had never been about him loving me back equally -- though I wanted him to, and had always wanted him to, I finally accepted that it was unnecessary. If it were -- if it had ever been, I wouldn't still love him, would I?

Dealing with it required me to give up the belief that I had any control over it. When I raised my white flag, I felt the spectrum: A mother's love for her children; a sister's love for her brother; a Christian's love for God; God's love for humanity; a husband's love for his wife of 60 years; a dog's love for his owner. And somewhere in between all those (or perhaps within them all) existed how I felt, and would always feel, for this guy sleeping on my couch with a giant beard who broke my heart in every stage of my life, and there wasn't a damn thing I, or anyone else, could do about it -- not then, not now, not 10 years ago or 10 years from now. When you feel that kind of thing, there's no going back.  

Sure, maybe two years ago I did have the L, O, V, and E in my possession, and I certainly put a lot of love in the world that wasn't aimed at Josh. But two years ago, I didn't have the guts it takes to be completely vulnerable to one person -- I would've called that sort of thing a weakness. I'd have climbed on top and looked down at it in judgment, when in reality, it's the bravest and hardest thing we can attempt to do as human beings. In retrospect, I see where others have attempted it with me, and how I failed to meet them in that hell. It's hard to think about, and I have spent a lot of time thinking about them this year. 

On Christmas night, Josh and I popped a nice bottle of Cava and he raised his glass: 

"Here's to all the amazing women who taught me how to love you."

When all is forgiven, I hope everyone I've broken ends up finding the person who can see them as I couldn't. 

For late-night lulz

"Love all, trust few, do harm to none." -Shakespeare

Look man, I know we can't all be Shakespeare, but you're pushing it with this one.

I wish you were still around to explain to me how a human being has ever managed to employ two of these three principles at the same time, let alone all three. As I interpret the maxim above, it is written as a paradox. To break it down into digestible possibilities, I have fashioned this chart-thing:

1. Love All	+ Trust Few	= Impossible
2. Love All	+ Do Harm to None	= Impossible
3. Trust Few	+ Do Harm to None	= Impossible

From the top...

1. Love All + Trust Few = Nope.

For the sake of communication, I shall assume "Love" is meant in the purest capacity, which exclusively implies unwavering "Trust." If one were to "Love All," he actually must "Trust All." If he doesn't "Trust All," then he cannot "Love All."

2. Love All + Do Harm to None = Nope.

Let me explain how it could work, for the sake of all the good in the world. If every human being followed Shakespeare's suggestions, it could work. However, Shakespeare himself pieced together a fictional embodiment of why everyone cannot live by this advice. I present Exhibit A, a quote from Shakespeare's Iago in Othello:

"He hath a daily beauty in his life

That makes me ugly..."

Still taking "Love" at maximum capacity, Shakespeare is asking us to simultaneously "Love All" (read as "Trust All") while doing "Harm to None." Let's just think about that for a second. If you were to "Trust All," the one being harmed is You. Why? Because people who "Love All" yet "Trust Few" are generally  possessive folks, and if you go around loving and trusting everyone blindly in a monogamy-centric society, you will eventually piss off an insecure asshole enough for him or her to go full-stabby on your blessed, bloody heart.

Not saying I wish it weren't this way, but the whole "be the change you want to see" thing doesn't get you very far when you're the victim of a crime of passion. Which leads me to...

3. Trust Few + Do Harm to None = Nope.

 If you "Trust Few," you damn well can't expect to "Do Harm to None." Again, for the sake of communication, I'm taking "Trust" at full capacity, which includes all the juicy, subconscious trappings that people rarely think about when that word leaves their lips. For example, everybody claims to believe in the ultimate "Good" of a fellow human being, until that human being signs up for welfare. After that, half of the country doesn't trust that the human being will only use that money until they can find a job in an earnest search. It doesn't matter who's right or wrong, because we're talking about "Trust" here -- the inherent lack of trust given out by you and I, as a matter of fact. 

Getting back to the philosophy here: "Trust Few" implies "Love Few," as Love and Trust cannot have conditions that oppose each other. In that regard, if one were to "Trust Few," they would also "Love Few," which inherently cannot result in "Do Harm to None." Those who "Trust Few" are the jealous, insecure assholes like Iago who can't live a complete existence if they're not comparing themselves to other, more desirable pieces of ass.

So! How could we make Shakespeare's statement into good advice? All we'd have to change is one tiny word. Laws of logic shall carry us from here:

If "Love All" then "Trust All"

If "Love All" and "Trust All" then "Do Harm to None"

And then Tah-Dah, World Peace. But until Mr. 'Speare rises up from the grave (or better yet -- proves that he actually existed as the notable, mis-quotable William) to edit his own logical fallacy, people are gonna keep holding onto their "Love All" while going cheap on the Trust, still wondering where the fuck all this Harm is coming from. 

Target Practice

At least one night a week, I get an itch and I can't find it.

Most of those nights, I assume I'll find it between the layers of cat hair and sawdust that blanket my garage. Most of those nights, I don't find it there. Lately, I haven't found it anywhere.

I've been stuck walking in circles, looking for words I might have dropped beneath every surface I've ever walked upon. Between cobwebby stacks of journals; in the undergraduate-grade "artwork" that desecrated the cinder block walls so many years ago. Sometimes, it dawns on me that I might look no different from a crack addict who's dropped a big fat rock through a crack in the floorboards. It drives my significant-O nuts, because he gets to watch me come upstairs at 8 a.m., exhausted and empty-handed.

Today, I stopped looking, and five minutes later I tripped over a treasure that I guess I dropped sometime between June and now. Direction, intent, focus, belief. Propellant, pressure, kinetic force. The vehicle; the simple machine; the Jaws of Life... there are a lot of words that stick to such a thing.

Yeah, it sucks to spend months building and sharpening arrows with the ferocity of a crack addict, and it sucks for everybody close to me, as well. But it's fucking awesome to have a thousand sharp arrows in the bag when you finally come across the goddamn bow.

Nature

I think a lot about the nature of human beings...I think a lot about what the world could be if everybody understood each other.

There are many academic disciplines that research different aspects of understanding -- science and math prove with matter and numbers, philosophy proves with ideological frameworks, psychology proves with behavior patterns, language proves with sound. Anthropology attempts to connect them all through the loop of culture, but math and science don't operate on anecdotal evidence. Science records measurable results, but only recently has it encountered something it can measure, but can't dissect; it won't publish a fact about dark matter until it has a sample of the stuff. Psychology wants to understand the human psyche, but it can't bring itself to accept a statement that doesn't apply to the entire population. Language itself dragged us into evolving civilizations -- once we were able to communicate with each other, everybody got smarter -- but the study often distracts itself with tiny details, sometimes to the point where it shuts itself off from the rest of the world. And history is nothing but a collection of stories told by those best able to communicate.

I think they could all answer each other's questions. I think about that a lot. A lot of people probably think about that.

I hear distant echoes of it in great works of literature, in politics, in the arts. I see it in the eyes of awe, on the lips of purpose, in the ectoplasm of altruism. I think we might all know all the answers, but only in tiny glimpses -- and as creatures bound by time, the glimpse isn't long enough for us to process it all.

The oldest things that still exist seem like the most obvious clues.

What is religion, assuming no gods exist? What evolutionary purpose did religion serve, and why is it still around?
What if everything operates pretty much the same way? What if the story of God, Mary and Jesus is actually just an analogy of a father, a mother and a son, and can be applied to any earthly creature? Is the Bible telling us that once we've had children, we'll change from jealous and selfish to all-merciful and unconditionally loving?
Was the story of Jesus telling us that some people are simply too good for this world?  That when somebody dies in the process of overturning the status quo, that person's work will not end if he has inspired enough people? If he has communicated clearly enough to achieve true understanding in enough people, maybe he does become immortal in a sense.
If it's all just a giant metaphor, the root of it still lies in communication -- it's just that metaphor is a really effective way to make people understand big ideas. In fact, you can use a metaphor to inflate a small idea just as well -- it makes big things small and small things big. It has the capacity to make an idea climb to the top or slide to the bottom of our internal priority lists. Politicians do this incessantly.

Jesus used a lot of metaphor, and his teachings were built on analogies. Does the longevity of the Jesus story reveal something very basic about how we've come to be what we are? Is he still around because, as a species, we must never forget the evolutionary importance of communication? If no one understands each other, we turn inside of ourselves -- we let ourselves become a petri dish for anti-civilization tendencies. We'll stop trusting each other, we'll assume others are the ignorant ones, and it'll become nearly impossible for us to truly understand what another person is trying to say. Was the world like that before Jesus?

Did he bring salvation from eternal (or internal) damnation in the form of metaphor?

I think about this a lot. I think about themes like "To understand God, you must know Jesus," and "Jesus is the only door to God's kingdom," and their potential relationship to metaphor. Is the Bible telling us that metaphor was actually God's gift to us, that allowed mortals to grasp the concept of immortality -- and in that, our own mortality?

Is God a construct of the human psyche that survived because it made us consider understanding things that are greater than us?

Before the Bible, we know that Greece didn't need it to flourish into an advanced society. They did, however, have their own extensive network of gods, and that network is very interesting -- all the Greek gods were behaviorally similar to mortals. In their myths, the gods pick favorites, they hook up and cheat on each other, they even rape humans. They are not fair or just or kind or forgiving, and the Greeks were subject to their whims.

Ancient Greeks also developed astronomy, early calculus, logic, long-form epics, arts, and the very notion of science. They lived in separate city-states, which operated independently and generally got along with each other. They created the first public school system, implying that education was expected of a citizen. They operated under the first form of democracy, and ran a system of checks and balances...And I might be reaching here, but I think it all came from having to live beneath the incessant drama of their gods.

I think their society was so successful because their gods showed them what not to do. They knew the importance of checks and balances because Zeus was a giant asshole with a lot of power, and they avoided any notion of glorifying a human king because Zeus would get the red ass. Is that the only way to maintain an egalitarian society? An invisible dictatorship?

Of course not, because all societies flourish differently, and they will continue to. All the variations are right answers, and all of them work at some point in time. They are born and they die; they are all as mortal as we are.

What if everything operates pretty much the same way we do? What if we're both microcosm and macrocosm of every mystery we've attempted to solve? What if everything is subject to whim, chance, and death, just as we are? If dark matter is just a dense spot of nothing in the ever-expanding nothingness of space, will we be able to accept that? Or will we deny it until the sun blows up, just because we couldn't create a ruler that can measure nothing?

I think the very essence of us is somewhere in the latter -- the reason we're at the top of the food chain, the reason we're driven to attempt to live in peace, the reason we started drawing pictures on rocks. The reason we want to be better than ourselves and leave knowledge behind for future generations.

The divine contradiction.

For human society to propagate, it must be driven to be better than the beasts. In a universe of chaos, on a planet where the odds are so very much against a fragile human body, we can probably assume hope was hard to come by in those early years. But hope isn't the only motivator...it's just an effective one. We read about Ancient Egyptians worshiping the very mortal Pharaoh, and we dug up their graves to find their massive emphasis on the afterlife. But in that society, at least in the earliest phase, only the Pharaoh had an afterlife -- the citizens didn't get that privilege, yet they still worked the fields and built incredibly sturdy monuments to their society. Where was their motivation? Pleasing their Pharaoh, their God.

Pleasing somebody was enough for them.

I sometimes wonder what it was that first made a human being happy. I like to think it was another human being. I like to think that when it happened, both people felt something bigger than themselves, and they couldn't understand it or measure it or forget it.

I like to think that communication grew out of that moment, because those two people had to find some way to express what they felt. Perhaps they'd never felt the need to do it before then; perhaps there was just nothing worth writing down. But this, this was more important than either of them, because it gave them a reason to stick together -- they now had a mission, a purpose, to relate this feeling to everyone they could find. It was too good to keep, the supply was unlimited, and it could be created out of nothing. But how did they find a way to talk about it? I'm not sure that they did. Love is hard to describe -- people are still trying to do it, in fact. In the Bible, it's said that God is love, over and over again.

But if we understand that God's only son is metaphor, then we get this: Love is the father of Metaphor.

And further:
Love created Man.
Man shared part of himself with Love to create Woman.
Love told Mary that the baby in her womb was (a) Metaphor, and was to be the savior of Mankind. No penetration required.
Metaphor got the message of Love across to the population, using allegory and parable. They started to follow Metaphor, because he gave enough of a shit (due to Love) to teach in a form they could understand.
Powered by Love, Metaphor turned water into wine; multiplied bread and fish to feed his followers -- Metaphor created something out of nothing.
Metaphor was nailed to a cross and died, in the society's effort to maintain its framework -- Metaphor was a threat to humans in power.
The disciples of Metaphor wrote books describing Love and miraculous events through Metaphor. The books maintain that the only way to describe Love -- to know it, to feel it -- is through Metaphor.

Is Jesus still affecting the world today because he broke the love-language barrier? Maybe he wasn't the first one to do it, but he definitely told the right words to the right people somewhere along the line. Nobody would have listened to him if he hadn't called himself a savior, or the son of God, so he told them exactly that. If it meant that much to him, I refuse to believe he wasn't in love with a lady.

I think too much about a lot of shit.